Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems verify who users are and determine what they can access, protecting sensitive data and data-based operations. IAM is the foundation for managing digital identities and controlling access privileges across complex IT ecosystems. As organizations shift to hybrid and cloud environments, IAM helps reduce risk exposure and is an important aspect of complying with regulations and building a resilient identity security posture.
Rubrik provides visibility across multiple identity provider (IDP) environments to surface risks and exposures, remediate those risks before they escalate, and recover the environment when malicious changes occur. This approach not only defends against identity-based threats but also makes it possible to recover identity systems and their relationships quickly and securely after an incident.
Insider threats or breaches by outsiders can result in unauthorized access to your systems. The resulting data breaches and service disruptions can erode trust and create regulatory liabilities.
At its most basic level, IAM prevents this by making sure that the right individuals access the right resources at the right time for the right reasons. It protects against unauthorized access by allowing only verified users and devices to connect to critical systems. Those users must prove both who they are and that they have the right to access the systems to which they're trying to connect.
An IAM system is a key part of efficient user lifecycle management: as employees join or leave an organization or change roles within it, their accounts must be provisioned, authorized, and eventually deprovisioned. While humans must remain in the loop, IAM systems can automate much of these workflows and reduce administrative overhead while minimizing the chance that unused credentials remain active—a frequent source of security gaps. Strong lifecycle management also supports organizational agility, making it easier to onboard remote employees or contractors quickly and securely.
IAM also plays a pivotal role in governance and compliance. Regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA require strict controls over who can access sensitive information, how that access is monitored, and what safeguards are in place to prevent misuse. IAM provides the framework to implement such policies consistently, generate audit trails, and demonstrate compliance during regulatory reviews.
IAM can help secure access by remote workers with context-aware authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication or conditional access policies. It safeguards sensitive intellectual property, such as healthcare records and financial data, by only allowing those with legitimate business needs to access them. A robust backup and recovery strategy supports IAM by offering a recovery option in the face of a successful attack or operational failure.
IAMs are built from components that have distinct functionality and work in tandem. These components validate users, assign the right privileges, and enforce consistent security controls.
Authentication and authorization are often mentioned together, but they serve distinct purposes within an IAM framework. Authentication is the process of verifying identity—confirming that a user is who they claim to be. This can involve traditional methods like passwords, but increasingly relies on stronger mechanisms such as multifactor authentication (MFA), biometrics, or adaptive authentication that evaluates contextual factors like device type or location.
Authorization, on the other hand, determines what resources an authenticated user can access. Role-based access control (RBAC), which assigns permissions based on a user’s role in the organization, is one of the most common authorization approaches. For instance, a financial analyst might have access to accounting systems but not HR records—following the practice of separation of duties.
By combining authentication and authorization, IAM can both validate who users are and appropriately limit their activities, reducing opportunities for exposure of sensitive data and systems.
Identity lifecycle management involves the process of properly creating, maintaining, and eventually retiring user accounts and access rights. Provisioning establishes new accounts with the appropriate permissions, while deprovisioning revokes that access promptly when an employee leaves or changes roles.
Employees must often request temporary or expanded privileges as their roles change, and IAM systems can streamline those requests through automated workflows. This automation reduces administrative burdens and maintains clear records of who requested access and why. These records also assist auditors who want to track changes to accounts and permissions to detect unusual activity or violations of policy.
Without strong lifecycle management, organizations risk orphaned accounts, privilege creep, and gaps that attackers can exploit. IAM helps businesses maintain tighter control over access at every stage of the user journey.
Security teams can use IAM to align access rights with organizational policies and regulatory requirements. This means enforcing separation-of-duties rules, setting limits on privileged accounts, and defining password and authentication standards. IAM systems generate reports and dashboards that help those teams monitor compliance and highlight areas of risk, such as users attempting to access systems outside their approved scope.
Many organizations implement or update their access governance policies as a part of their broader compliance initiatives as they grapple with their responsibilities under GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS. IAM not only enforces the technical controls required by these frameworks but also provides evidence during audits. When paired with resilient data protection strategies like an enterprise backup solution, governance becomes part of a holistic security posture that minimizes both operational and regulatory risk.
IAM provides the consistency needed to unify identity management across on-premises, cloud, and multi-cloud environments. Organizations that adopt cloud services and hybrid IT models can use IAM to manage identities across distributed infrastructures. Users connect from multiple devices to SaaS and cloud platforms; with IAM, this access is both seamless and secure.
Identity federation enables credentials from a central provider to be trusted across third-party systems, while single sign-on (SSO) reduces password fatigue and gives IT teams greater visibility into user activity. Cloud-native IAM models extend these capabilities with features like conditional access, which evaluates factors such as device compliance or location before granting entry. These controls help balance security with user productivity in cloud environments.
IAM can also protect sensitive backup data stored in the cloud. Businesses increasingly rely on immutable data backups to guard against ransomware and unauthorized deletions. By applying IAM policies to these backups, organizations can strictly control who has access to recovery points, preventing attackers with stolen credentials from tampering with or erasing critical data.
Compromised credentials remain one of the leading causes of breaches. IAM platforms are designed to prevent identity compromise through layered defenses such as multi-factor authentication, adaptive access controls, and continuous monitoring of login behavior. These tools help detect anomalies early—like a user or device attempting to access critical resources from an unusual location—and automatically trigger additional verification or block access altogether.
In the aftermath of a breach, IAM systems support rapid recovery and remediation by rolling back malicious changes, resetting credentials, and restoring normal access configurations. This recovery capability extends to identity infrastructure itself: backups should make it possible to rebuild directories, trust relationships, and access policies from clean, verifiable states. By integrating these recovery processes into IAM, organizations avoid the downtime and uncertainty that often follow identity-based attacks.
IAM also underpins zero trust architectures, which assume no user or device should be inherently trusted. By requiring continuous verification and enforcing least-privilege access, IAM builds resilience into daily operations.
Implementing IAM effectively requires thoughtful planning, policy alignment, and ongoing oversight. The following best practices provide a framework for building a secure and resilient IAM program that meets your organization's needs.
Define Roles and Responsibilities: A successful IAM program begins with a clear understanding of user roles and their associated access needs. Organizations should carefully map access to job functions. This involves cataloging systems, data, and applications, then aligning them to specific responsibilities across the workforce. The process of documenting these responsibilities can be helpful in and of itself, as it allows the organization to establish that every user’s access aligns with business requirements.
Once complete, the process will inform how IAM systems operate. For example, a medical professional may need access to patient records but not HR systems, while a help desk technician might sometimes require temporary elevated privileges on various systems to resolve technical issues. Establishing role-based access models reduces the likelihood of sensitive systems or data being accessed inappropriately.
Adopt the Principle of Least Privilege: The principle of least privilege (PoLP) dictates that users should only have the access necessary to perform their jobs—and nothing more. Limiting access in this way reduces the potential damage if an account is compromised, since attackers will be constrained by the account's narrow permissions.
Organizations can implement PoLP by enforcing role-based access controls, regularly reviewing permission sets, and removing unnecessary rights as employees change roles or projects. Temporary access should also be tightly controlled, automatically expiring after the task is complete. This practice can help meet regulatory requirements that demand strict data protection.
Monitor, Audit, and Review Access: IAM is not a “set it and forget it” system. Continuous monitoring, auditing, and review are essential to detect anomalies and maintain compliance. Automated monitoring tools can surface unusual activity, such as login attempts from unfamiliar locations or users trying to access systems outside their normal scope.
Auditing provides the records needed to investigate incidents and demonstrate compliance with standards like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Rubrik can strengthen this process by providing visibility into identity-related risks and anomalies across environments. By combining IAM monitoring with data protection insights, organizations can quickly identify threats, remediate them, and keep both identities and data secure.
By managing identities, enforcing access controls, and embedding resilience into recovery strategies, IAM enables organizations to operate securely in an increasingly complex IT landscape. Rubrik enhances this foundation with IAM-ready solutions that protect, monitor, and recover identities in real time. By integrating identity security with data protection, Rubrik helps enterprises safeguard critical systems, maintain compliance, and keep operations running in case of a breach.